People
Updated 05/18/26Co-Founder & Past Organizer
Co-Founder
Research Management Team Member
Research Fellow
AI Research Lead
Research Lead
Associate Research Fellow
Research Fellow
Funding Details
Updated 05/18/26- Annual Budget
- -
- Current Runway
- -
- Funding Goal
- $126,000
- Funding Raised to Date
- $600,000
Org Details
Updated 05/18/26AI Safety Camp (AISC) is a non-profit initiative that runs programs for diversely skilled researchers who want to collaborate on open problems for reducing AI existential risk. The program was conceived in November 2017 at Effective Altruism Global London by Linda Linsefors, who was seeking a collaborative research environment for AI safety work. Together with Remmelt Ellen, who took on meetings and logistics, the first camp was organized and held in April 2018 in Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, with 21 participants working across 5 research teams over 10 days. Since then, AISC has run 11 editions. The early camps (AISC1-AISC3) were held in person in locations including Las Palmas, Prague, and Madrid. Starting with AISC4 in 2020, the program shifted to a fully virtual format, which it has maintained since. Each edition runs for approximately 3 months, typically from mid-January to mid-April, with all participants committing at least 10 hours per week and attending weekly meetings. Project leads propose and oversee research initiatives, while team members join projects based on their interests and skills. The program has produced significant outcomes across its history. Alumni have gone on to take 43 jobs in AI safety at organizations including OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, MIRI, and various governance bodies. Ten organizations have been founded by alumni, including Arb Research, AI Safety Support, and AI Standards Lab. Projects originating at AISC have received a total of $1.4 million in follow-on grants, and seven published papers have emerged from camp projects. An independent impact assessment by Arb Research found that 5-10% of participants become AI safety researchers who would not otherwise have entered the field, at a cost of approximately $12,000-$30,000 per new researcher. The organizing team is led by Remmelt Ellen, who has been with AISC from the start and oversees program design and strategy, and Robert Kralisch, who focuses on onboarding diverse projects with an emphasis on conceptual progress on the AI Alignment Problem. Linda Linsefors, the co-founder, has transitioned to an advisory role. Additional organizers contribute part-time to applications, team selection, participant facilitation, and outreach. AISC has historically faced funding challenges despite strong community endorsement of its impact. The program has received major grants from the Future Fund ($290,000), Effective Altruism Funds ($180,000), and the Survival and Flourishing Fund ($130,000) as of July 2022. The program nearly shut down in early 2024 due to funding shortfalls before successful community fundraising efforts kept it going. AISC operates with a variable budget ranging from $15,000 for a minimal edition to $300,000 for a fully stipended program.
Theory of Change
Updated 05/18/26AI Safety Camp believes that the field of AI safety is severely talent-constrained, with far fewer researchers working on safety compared to capabilities. Their theory of change is to expand and diversify the AI safety talent pipeline by providing a low-barrier, structured entry point where newcomers from varied backgrounds and geographies can try their hand at concrete AI safety research under experienced mentors. By running a part-time, virtual program, they reach people outside the traditional Bay Area and London hubs who might never otherwise enter the field. The causal chain runs from recruitment and team formation, through hands-on research experience, to participants either producing novel safety research directly, transitioning into full-time AI safety careers, or founding new safety-focused organizations. At roughly $12,000-$30,000 per new researcher entering the field, AISC aims to be one of the most cost-effective talent development programs in AI safety.
Grants Received
Updated 05/18/26Projects– no linked projects
Updated 05/18/26Discussion
Key risk: Counterfactual impact may be overstated and marginal returns limited, as a fully remote, part-time format yields variable project quality and the binding bottleneck may now be high-quality mentorship and absorbable roles rather than more entrants, meaning additional funding could have diminishing impact.
Endorsement comment
Case for funding: AISC’s structured, mentor-led, remote cohort model has a quantified track record (Arb Research: 5–10% conversion at ~$12k–$30k per new researcher) of bringing diverse newcomers into AI safety who otherwise wouldn’t, with alumni placements at Anthropic/OpenAI/DeepMind and new orgs, making it a uniquely cost-effective lever to grow the safety talent pool outside traditional hubs.