People
Updated 06/10/26By grantmaking.aicreator
Funding Details
- Start Date
- -
- End Date
- -
- Expected Duration
- -
- Funding Raised to Date
- -
- Annual Budget
- -
- Monthly Burn Rate
- -
- Current Runway
- -
- Funding Stage
- -
- Fiscal Sponsor
- -
Project Details
Updated 06/10/26By grantmaking.aiProject summary
Epoch AI is a leading research institute that develops public knowledge on AI's trajectory through rigorous research, novel benchmarking, and comprehensive data tracking. We seek general support to expand our work informing policymakers, industry leaders, and society on AI development and its implications. Our unique position combining technical depth with accessible communication has made us a trusted source for stakeholders ranging from government officials to tech leaders.
What are this project's goals? How will you achieve them?
Broadly, our mission is to conduct and disseminate rigorous research on the trajectory and impact of artificial intelligence, to enable better policy and decision-making. With additional funding, we aim to expand three key initiatives:
- Data Curation: Building on our successful AI model and hardware tracking to cover AI clusters and companies, launching weekly data insights for timely analysis.
- Capability Measurement: Growing our AI Benchmarking Hub through independent model evaluations and novel benchmarks like FrontierMath.
- Economic Modeling: Developing a framework combining AI scaling laws with growth theory to analyze automation impacts and compute scaling.
We'll achieve these through strategic hiring of technical talent, maintaining our commitment to rigorous analysis, and expanding our successful track record of creating accessible, high-impact content.
How will this funding be used?
We're seeking $10M over two years to scale our impact:
- $2M/year for the data program (tracking AI systems, hardware, clusters)
- $2M/year for AI benchmarking (capability measurement, new benchmark development)
- $6M for team expansion including an AI Data Lead, research engineers, and operations staff
- Reaching 30 full-time employees while maintaining project-specific contractor relationships
Who is on your team? What's your track record on similar projects?
Our 23-person team (https://epoch.ai/about) has demonstrated strong execution in 2024:
- Published groundbreaking benchmarks (FrontierMath) with 70+ mathematicians
- Released major reports cited by tech leaders and government officials
- Published in top venues (ICLM, NeurIPS 2024)
- Grew audience from 2K to 15K Twitter followers
- Attracted 360K website users
- Successfully scaled from 10 to 23 full-time employees this year
What are the most likely causes and outcomes if this project fails?
- Talent Competition: The competitive market for AI researchers could dampen our capacity to attract and retain talent
- Data Access: Limited visibility into private AI development could affect our tracking capabilities
How much money have you raised in the last 12 months, and from where?
Roughly 75% of our funding comes from Open Philanthropy. The rest comes from individual donors, organizations such as Survival and Flourishing Fund, or from service agreements with collaborators on projects aligned with our mission.
Grants Received
Updated 06/10/26By grantmaking.aiDiscussion
Token donation to signal support. (Somewhat amusing juxtaposing with Neel's much larger token regrant.)
I'm concerned about conflicts of interests Epoch AI might have, by receiving funding from OpenAI. Please tell me if this is unjustified.
Additionally, I'm confused as to why this funding wasn't disclosed clearly and openly from the start.
@KabirKumar Hey! Here Jaime, director of Epoch. For context on the situation with OpenAI, please read this blogpost which hopefully will clarify what happened and our current relation with OpenAI.
https://epoch.ai/blog/openai-and-frontiermath
The TL;DR is that they funded and have exclusive access to FrontierMath, a math benchmark.
Going forward, we plan to continue collaborating with OpenAI and other labs on creating other benchmarks, and possibly other projects that advance our mission of informing the public about the trajectory of AI.
@KabirKumar If concerned, surely it's good to fund Epoch via Manifund to reduce their dependence on OpenAI?
Three previous employees of Epoch just split off to launch Mechanize. This project seems like it could be acceleratory. I think it would be useful for Epoch to provide an update on whether they plan to take any action to reduce the chance of anything similar happening in the future (or alternatively whether they think it wouldn't make sense for them to try to avoid similar occurrences in the future).
[Final report]
Description of subprojects and results, including major changes from the original proposal
See our impact report for 2025: https://epoch.ai/blog/epoch-impact-report-2025
I'm re-granting because I've been very impressed with the quality of Epoch's work. It's clearly far and away better than any competition when it comes to actually understanding what's going on with AI (and being publicly communicated), and several people I know who are part of Epoch strike me as highly competent. I'm also a fan of their new weekly newsletter. I haven't carefully checked the details of much of my work myself, but the one example where I thought I found an error (using total rather than active parameters of an MoE model), they then produced a newsletter with a compelling argument for why their way made more sense, which I was impressed by.
I see the main theory of impact of Epoch as broadly helping key decisionmakers in society (policy-makers, businesses, the AI safety community, etc) be well informed about AI: what has already happened, what is happening, what will happen. I'm a bit less confident in how well their projects do on the dissemination front. I see them go viral fairly often, though I am totally in a massive bubble. I've seen some scattered examples like Satya Nadella having Epoch graphs in a slide deck, which seem pretty promising!
Is this theory of impact important?
I think that AI is clearly a big deal, at this point, having an important impact on society, and expect this to accelerate. In addition to the big issues of misuse and misalignment, there's also just a lot of social and policy change that needs to happen to handle this well. By default, society changes slowly, and tech policy often makes little sense. High quality information is far from sufficient to fix this, but it helps!
I have some concern that this also has negative externalities by increasing the number of people who realise AI is a big deal and decide to race (in a similar sense to how, eg, scaling laws got more people realising the potential of AI). But my guess is that this isn't that big a deal. I think that "AI is a big deal" is pretty widely believed at this point, so that ship has largely sailed. Another concern is that this increases competitive pressures by making it clearer to people when they're losing the race. But on the other hand, this helps the person in first place realise it, which is high value (see eg the Cold War "missile gap"). And I expect key actors like AGI labs already have much better awareness of what's going on than most, so Epoch adds less value to them.
Overall, this isn't my area of expertise so I'm not confident, but my best guess is that Epoch is doing great work.
I'm only donating a token amount as I don't think this is my comparative advantage as a funder, but I would encourage others to donate, and want Epoch to have as much funding as they can productively use.
Agree on this. I do think the strongest argument against funding Epoch for most people on Manifund is that it can and probably will be supported aggressively by existing large funders. Evidence that this isn't the case would update me a lot on more funding to Epoch being valuable.
@habryka it seems that Open Phil didn't want to fund FrontierMath, so Epoch went to OpenAI for funding. I think more funding for Epoch would be good to reduce reliance on commercial partners who might require dataset access.
@RyanKidd They clearly state that FrontierMath was a project commissioned by OpenAI. https://epoch.ai/blog/openai-and-frontiermath (which makes me think that your story isn't very accurate, let me know if I'm confused)
More to the point, it seems very backwards to me to take Epoch AI secretly doing commissioned work for OpenAI without letting the contributors know as a reason to give more funding for Epoch AI. Some thoughts
@Meeri At this point I don't feel qualified to comment and I defer to @Jsevillamol.