People
Updated 06/10/26By grantmaking.aicreator
Funding Details
- Start Date
- -
- End Date
- -
- Expected Duration
- -
- Funding Raised to Date
- -
- Annual Budget
- -
- Monthly Burn Rate
- -
- Current Runway
- -
- Funding Stage
- -
- Fiscal Sponsor
- -
Project Details
Updated 06/10/26By grantmaking.aiA note from JueYan Zhang, who recommended this grant:
H was recently accepted into a Computer Science PhD program at a leading UK university, where they will explore institutional and technical models for equitable access to safe AI systems.
This is a high-leverage opportunity, but comes with significant upfront costs:
- Tuition fees of ~£33,370 for the first year
- Living costs of ~£24,420
- Student Visa fees of ~£6,500
£64,290 1.3482 (GBP/USD) 1.01 (1% FX fee) = $87,543.
H is not eligible for UK student loans and faces a tight deadline to confirm enrollment. They are applying for other sources of funding but cannot count on them materializing in time to start this fall.
I was introduced to H through trusted mutual contacts. They’ve worked with UK DSIT, where their research has informed efforts on AI risk assessment. They’ve also held research and fellowship positions at the Oxford Martin School, GovAI, CSER, and IAPS. Their publications and policy papers have been relevant in discussions such as the UK AI Safety Summit. The financial constraints they are facing are real blockers to pursuing this opportunity.
Given the relevance of their research to global public goods and the potential for their work to inform policy in key areas of AI governance, I am happy to recommend funding to support H’s education and continuing research.
Approving this grant to support a promising individual's continued research and education. While Manifund generally does not prefer keeping identities private, I've corroborated with Jueyan on the details here, and consider H a promising candidate and agree that in this situation it's reasonable to keep the grantee pseudonymous.
(Just musing: in the future, one market-based way to thread this needle would be to charge a higher operational fee, eg 20% rather than our standard 5%, to price in our cost of doing pseudonymized grants)